Time Corrected Van Halen is the Worst Van Halen

April 09, 2021 2 min read

Time Corrected Van Halen is the Worst Van Halen

There’s no “right” way to make an album. But, if you’re looking for a template to capturing a great band with great sound, you don’t need to look much further than the first Van Halen record.

“Van Halen” wasn’t exactly a flashy production. Tracked at Sunset Sound in October 1977 for the modest sum of $40,000 (compare that to the whopping $1.4 million Fleetwood Mac spent cutting “Tusk” the following year), the approach was very much “keep it simple.” As engineer Jon Landee told Van Halen News Desk in 2013:

“They’d barely had any studio experience… at that point, we really wanted to get them before they knew what they were doing – just have them come in and play and then get them out. So we spent very little time in pre-production, in fact, we treated the first album like it was a demo.”

Part of that approach was getting Van Halen to do what they did best; play live. As bassist Michael Anthony told MusicRadar in 2010:

"We basically just took our live show and all the songs we knew and went for it. The whole album only took a couple of weeks.”

In today’s context, one of the most amazing things about that first VH record is that it’s almost entirely bereft of overdubs. Only“Runnin’ With the Devil”, "Jamie's Cryin'", "Feel Your Love Tonight" and "Ice Cream Man" contain guitar overdubs. And, according to Landee, even those dubs “were done in one take.” 

The live, in your face sound of the first Van Halen album was a hit with the rock n’ roll record buying public. Released in February 1978, it went Platinum in October of that year. In 1996, it was re-certified by the RIAA for selling over 10 million copies in the US alone.

Unfortunately, you couldn’t make a record like that today. Bands don’t hone their live chops like Van Halen did for one – the band had racked up tons of live experience before setting foot in the studio. For another, most new tracks tend to be “quantized.” What exactly does that mean? I’ll leave it to YouTuber Dr. Bob to explain it to you:

"Almost every new song you've heard in the past 20 to 30 years has been time corrected or programmed, which means every part of the song is in perfect time and locked to the grid or metronome to non-human standards of playing." 

Quantizing is fine for plenty of genres, but when it comes to no-nonsense rock n’ roll. Well… hear for yourself. Dr. Bob’s taken the liberty of quantizing VH’s seminal “Runnin’ With the Devil” – even Eddie’s solo. You can check it out below:

As Classic Rock states, Dr. Bob effectively illustrates that the “’all over the place tempo’, the peaks, the valleys and the groove are what made the song great in the first place.”

"Don't kill a groove just because you have the tools to," Bob concludes. Here at Thalia, we’re inclined to agree. 



Also in Fingerboard Stories

These “New” Hendrix and Doors Songs… Were Made by A.I.
These “New” Hendrix and Doors Songs… Were Made by A.I.

April 16, 2021 2 min read

“To show the world what’s been lost to this mental health crisis, we’ve used artificial intelligence to create the album the 27 Club never had the chance to. Through this album, we’re encouraging more music industry insiders to get the mental health support they need, so they can continue making the music we all love for years to come.
Picks Are Way Older than You Think…
Picks Are Way Older than You Think…

March 25, 2021 3 min read

As a quick recap, in the late 19th century, picks made from tortoiseshell (the shell of hawksbill sea turtles to be precise) were the gold standard when it came to assisted strumming. However, this along with the popularity of tortoiseshell in the manufacture of a bunch of other stuff, lead to the near extinction of the hawksbill sea turtle. Once it was placed on the endangered species list in 1973, tortoiseshell picks went the way of the dodo.
Where Do You Stand on Modeling Amps?
Where Do You Stand on Modeling Amps?

March 19, 2021 3 min read

Fortus isn’t wrong about the challenges of achieving certain tonal subtleties when using modelling amps and plugins. But, the truth is, the technology is getting better. I’ve been playing around with a couple of tube amp imitating plugins recently that get surprisingly close to capturing the nuances Fortus is talking about – at least to my luddite ears. And, I don’t doubt that differences between modelling amps and the real thing will be practically imperceptible in the not too distant future.